Skip to content

Silent Sorority

Infertility Survivors Finally Heard

Menu
  • My Story
    • Silent Sorority: Memoir
    • Coming2Terms Blog
  • About
  • Bylined Work
    • Times of London: The False Hope of ‘Fertility’ Benefits
    • NYT Op-Ed: The Big IVF Add-on Racket
    • STAT: Dark side of IVF
    • Do à la carte menus serve infertility patients?
    • New York Times Op-Ed: Selling the Fantasy of Fertility
    • WIRED: The Sobering Facts About Egg Freezing
    • FORTUNE: The Tough Truth About Egg Freezing
    • The Huffington Post
    • Medium ‘Human Parts’
    • Seleni Institute
    • New York Times Motherlode
    • Infertility’s Emotional Impact
  • In the News
    • MSNBC: Childless Not By Choice
    • STAT: IVF ‘add-ons’ rest on shaky science
    • IVF ‘Add-On’ Procedures Offer False Hope
    • Named ‘Top Health Blogger’ by Health Magazine
    • The Globe and Mail
    • The New York Times
    • MarketWatch – 10 Things Fertility Clinics Won’t Say
    • Women’s eNews
    • Radio: Living Childfree
    • Yahoo Shine Health Feature
    • The Broad Side
    • ABC TV Interview
    • Redbook
  • ReproTech Medicine Reporting
Menu
biological clock

Biological Clock and the Capitalizing of Fertility Fears

Posted on May 13, 2016December 11, 2016 by Pamela Tsigdinos

Moira Weigel’s essay in The Guardian, The foul reign of the biological clock, casts new light on a little explored but powerful cultural phenomenon. It also revealed the fertility industry’s long history of capitalizing on fertility fears, with women paying the price.

Let’s start with the facts. The term ‘biological clock,’ Weigel explains, was originally coined by scientists to describe circadian rhythms, the processes that tell our bodies when we should rise, eat, and sleep.

In the late 1970s, however, the term quickly became a fixture in popular lexicon — a shorthand for the finite nature of female fertility. Embedded in the popular press coverage of the biological clock, Weigel notes, is “the idea that being female is a weakness.”

Her thesis that “the story of the biological clock is a story about science and sexism” is spot on. It was suddenly the woman’s responsibility “to plan their love lives with an eye to having children before it was ‘too late’.”

[bctt tweet=”The fertility industry’s masterful use of fear is truly Harvard Business School case-study worthy. #IVF ” username=”SilentSorority”]

I was in my teens when this cultural phenomenon took hold. I remember it well. Almost overnight the biological clock was at the center of all manner of modern challenges — whether in relationships, career or simply living.

Biological Clock: From Pop Culture To Fertility Industry ‘FUD’

CaptureBeyond Weigel’s well researched exploration of the biological clock’s cultural role in counteracting the effects of women’s liberation, I’d like to zero in on how the biological clock became the catalyst for today’s rapidly-expanding fertility industry (projected to be $27B for IVF alone by 2022).

The industry’s masterful use of fear, uncertainty and doubt – FUD – is truly Harvard Business School case-study worthy.

This line in her essay brings the point home:

…If a marketing team had been trying to come up with an advertising campaign to sell a broader population of women on IVF, they could hardly have done better than the flood of stories about the biological clock that the Washington Post article by Richard Cohen started.

Yes, the biological clock and the arrival of Louise Joy Brown via in vitro fertilization (IVF) can both be traced back to 1978.

In the years since, the reprotech industry — including RESOLVE and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) — have surreptitiously turned the modern day interpretation of the biological clock, the natural aging of a woman’s eggs, into a ‘disease.’ This disease characterization, incidentally, allows them to lobby for health insurance coverage of expensive treatments.

See also  Don't Ignore...There's More Than One Infertility Ending

More treatments = more profits. Clinics are compensated $15,000-$18,000 per cycle — depending on how many add-on services are involved. No matter that there’s a near 80% failure rate per cycle. The clinic earns regardless of outcome.  You won’t find the number of failed cycles in the marketing materials.

Men Have Their Own Fertility Shelf Life

Among the takeaways from Weigel’s essay: It’s clearly time for a narrative rewrite. What’s been wildly under-reported is that men have their own biological clock. As Weigel reports, “from the 1980s there has been a large and growing body of research showing that sperm counts and quality diminish over the years.”

The children of older fathers have much higher risk of autism and other complications than those of younger ones do. Often ‘old sperm’ simply flail and perish around an egg they are trying to fertilise.

A search on fertility issues inevitably focuses on women despite this fact shared in Weigel’s piece:

Women and men are found to experience fertility problems at roughly equal rates, but you would never know it from reading most press coverage of the subject. Our assumption seems to be that reproduction is a female responsibility first and foremost. Anything going wrong with it must be a woman’s fault.

Women Have Paid the Price in More Ways Than One

With a fresh perspective, Weigel writes incredulously:

“Our culture so takes for granted that women will suffer in order to become pregnant, and these methods are so profitable that few researchers are invested in exploring alternatives. Even if a couple is having trouble conceiving because of ‘male factor’ problems, the female partner still has to undergo IVF.”

ASRMSadly, she’s right. And with 20 years between us, Ms. Weigel and her generation will have to contend with yet another new way the fertility industry will cash in by sowing the seeds of biological clock fear and blame: social egg freezing.  In 2014, as a generation of entrepreneurial clinics moved to capitalize on the business opportunity, the ASRM annual meeting in Hawaii hosted a few sessions on the latest biological clock growth market: women without any specific infertility condition — other than living and growing older with each day on the planet. It was titled: Fertility Preservation Patients: How to Re-engineer your Practice to Accommodate Them.

See also  Why Do We Look the Other Way On IVF Addiction?

Echoing one of my many blog posts, Weigel writes, “like any industry, the assisted reproductive technology industry seeks to expand and to capture new markets.”

To make a play on the adage “when you have a hammer everything looks like nail,” you could say the latest law of the instrument is that when you have a fertility clinic every biological function becomes the basis for a fertility treatment.

Moreover, Wiegel and I agree about one glaring omission: the lack of longitudinal studies and clinic data tracking the health risks of women who inject hormones and undergo egg retrieval. As I wrote in a cautionary piece about egg freezing for WIRED, no one knows how much of the chemicals used in the latest freezing process are absorbed by eggs, and whether they are toxic to cell development. Furthermore, even with the new flash freezing process, the most comprehensive data available reveals a 77 percent failure rate of frozen eggs resulting in a live birth in women aged 30, and a 91 percent failure rate in women aged 40.

The foul reign of the biological clock, it seems, is extending to yet another generation, per this fact Weigel shared:

Studies have shown that since the turn of the millennium, women are growing concerned about their fertility at younger and younger ages. In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Survey of Family Growth reported that in the US the number of 22 to 29-year-olds who had received fertility treatment had doubled over the previous seven years.

@PamelaJeanne @gdnlongread the next best thing is to write toward 18 and 23 year olds I think!

— Moira Weigel (@moiragweigel) May 12, 2016

For more on the questionable business tactics used by the fertility industry over the years, check out: Fertility Industry Evokes Glengarry Glen Ross

Now, dear readers, the floor is yours. Let’s discuss.

Related Posts:

  • Looking Out for Our Sisters In a World of False Fertility Claims
    Looking Out for Our Sisters In a World of False Fertility…
  • When Did Normal Aging Become an Infertility Condition?
    When Did Normal Aging Become an Infertility Condition?
  • Lived IVF Reality Gets New Look
    Lived IVF Reality Gets New Look
  • IVF Rollercoaster: BBC Radio Show Callers Describe 'Grueling, Painful, Isolating, Roll of Dice'
    IVF Rollercoaster: BBC Radio Show Callers Describe…
  • 'The Mother of All Dilemmas' Explores Cultural Conditioning and 'Choices'
    'The Mother of All Dilemmas' Explores Cultural Conditioning…
  • IVF Industry Can't Have it Both Ways
    IVF Industry Can't Have it Both Ways

3 thoughts on “Biological Clock and the Capitalizing of Fertility Fears”

  1. dubliner in deutschland says:
    May 13, 2016 at 10:33 am

    I found the article very well written and interesting. I really hate the term “biological clock” and this idea that women need to find a man by 30 and start popping out kids whereas men have all the time in the world! And women always get the raw end of the stick like the article points out as even when infertility IS caused by the man, the women ends up being the one who has the much harder parts of IVF to go through- injecting, hormones, egg retrieval operation.

    These days I’ve seen couples who have only been trying for six months to get pregnant but because the woman is 35+ IVF is suggested instead of giving it more time. And I also hear lots of stories of couples with unexplained infertility where the fertility clinics don’t bother trying harder to get to the bottom of the issue but just suggest IVF as an easy fix, whereas it’s not something easy to go through at all.

    Reply
    1. Pamela Tsigdinos says:
      May 13, 2016 at 5:43 pm

      Thanks for your comment, dubliner in deustchland. We are in complete agreement. The practice of overprescribing IVF was studied and reported on in The British Medical Journal. The Irish Times reported on it. Here’s the link http://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/too-many-couples-receiving-unnecessary-ivf-study-warns-1.1671272

      There’s much more data and studies available here: https://www.blog.silentsorority.com/knowledge-is-power/

      Reply
  2. loribeth says:
    May 23, 2016 at 2:39 am

    I loved this article, especially the rampant sexism that it points out so thoroughly. On a slightly related note, I’m in the middle of reading Rebecca Traister’s “All the Single Ladies” right now. Of course, there are many single women who are mothers, as well as married women without children, but there is SO much in this book that sounds all too familiar, when it comes to social assumptions & attitudes re: single women. Change is often slow (& one step forward, two steps back) — but I do think things are changing for women, for the better, thanks to people like you & Moira & Rebecca. Thanks for continuing to fight the good fight! ;)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

My Books

Popular Posts

  • Strong At The Broken Places
  • Life After Infertility: One Decade, Many Thoughts
  • Identity after Infertility and Failed IVF
  • The Invisibleness of Infertility: To Pass or Not to Pass?
  • IVF Rollercoaster: BBC Radio Show Callers Describe ‘Grueling, Painful, Isolating, Roll of Dice’
  • Infertility Community’s Black Sheep: Women Who Don’t Achieve Motherhood
  • Not Having Children After Infertility ‘An Assault to Identity’
  • Infertility Community: A Microcosm of Society Misunderstandings and All
  • Casting off Chains of Infertility: Fertility Diary, The Life of Pi and Search for Peace
  • Defining Abuse in Assisted Reproductive Technology

Subscribe to New Blog Posts

 Subscribe in a reader

Archives

Tags

Avalanche bioethics change Childless childlessness conflict culture egg freezing emotions expectations fertility industry fertility treatment friendships grief growth guest post healing health heroines identity infertility IVF Jessica Hepburn Jody Day journey lessons loss media motherhood myths narrative non-moms psychology reinvention relationships research RESOLVE silent sorority society stigma survival trauma travel truths what ifs

Categories

  • An Act of Kindness
  • Another Perspective
  • Bioethics
  • Book Musings
  • Changing Perceptions
  • Choices
  • Different Than I Expected
  • Documentary
  • Fortitude
  • Guest Post
  • Linking Around
  • Movies
  • News Reports and Studies
  • Pandemic
  • Pop Culture
  • Psychology
  • Relationships
  • Remembrance
  • Spontaneity
  • Strength Personified
  • Tapestry of Voices
  • The Cycle Relay Forum
  • Uncategorized
  • What I Wish I'd Know Then

Recent Comments

  • loribeth on Permission to Feel Emotions Deeply
  • Permission to Feel Emotions Deeply - Silent Sorority on Prince Harry and I Agree: Bury Grief at Your Peril
  • Mali on Permission to Feel Emotions Deeply
  • Permission to Feel Emotions Deeply - Silent Sorority on Grief Is a Form of Love
  • Permission to Feel Emotions Deeply - Silent Sorority on Kindness Comes in Many Forms

Blogroll

  • A Blank New Page
  • Bent Not Broken
  • Childless By Marriage
  • Conscious Childless Elderwomen
  • Des meandres aux etoiles (French)
  • Different Shores
  • Elaine OK (German)
  • Ever Upward
  • Femme Sans Enfant (French)
  • Finding A Different Path
  • Gateway Women
  • Infertile Phoenix
  • Infertility Honesty
  • It's Inconceivable
  • Jessica Hepburn's Blog
  • Just Being
  • Lavender Luz
  • Lesley Pyne
  • Life Without Baby blog
  • MSNBC – Life After IVF
  • No Kidding in NZ
  • Other side of the threshold (Swedish)
  • ReproTechTruths
  • Sitrrup Queen's Blogroll
  • SlidingDoors
  • Slow Swimmers & Fried Eggs
  • The Dove Cote
  • The Empty Cradle (Brisbane)
  • The Infertility Voice
  • The Next 15,000 Days
  • The NotMom
  • The Road Less Travelled
  • Uber Barrens Club
  • Walk in Our Shoes
© 2023 Silent Sorority | Powered by Superbs Personal Blog theme